Skip to content

Conversation

@znarfm
Copy link
Collaborator

@znarfm znarfm commented Nov 27, 2025

Checklist

  • The page(s) are in the correct platform directories: common, linux, osx, windows, sunos, android, etc.
  • The page description(s) have links to documentation or a homepage.
  • The page(s) follow the content guidelines.
  • The page(s) follow the style guide.
  • The PR contains at most 5 new pages.
  • The PR is authored by me, or has been human-reviewed if it was created with AI or machine translation software.
  • The PR title conforms to the recommended templates.
  • Version of the command being documented (if known):
  • Reference issue: Use espeak page for espeak-ng  #8469

@github-actions github-actions bot added new command Issues requesting creation of a new page or PRs adding a new page for a command. page edit Changes to an existing page(s). review needed Prioritized PRs marked for reviews from maintainers. labels Nov 27, 2025
@tldr-bot
Copy link

The build for this PR failed with the following error(s) at commit
72aa460bc536494a9ab487226a2b892d153946fd:

pages/common/espeak.md:4: TLDR004 Command descriptions should end in a period

Please fix the error(s) and push again.

@znarfm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

znarfm commented Nov 27, 2025

I created pages for both espeak-ng and speak-ng, but they basically function the same. I did not create an alias page since they aren't symlinks to one another, and seems to vary in filesize.

❯ ls -l $(which speak-ng)
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 498240 Oct  6 08:00 /usr/bin/speak-ng*

❯ ls -l $(which espeak-ng)
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 24832 Oct  6 08:00 /usr/bin/espeak-ng*

They also have a separate documentation page for each, but both are similar (speak-ng documentation is older by 2 years than espeak-ng documentation).

Thoughts?

@Managor
Copy link
Member

Managor commented Nov 28, 2025

I think it's ok to have them be separate pages. In case one diverges from the other in syntax.

@Managor Managor merged commit 25bc857 into tldr-pages:main Nov 28, 2025
4 checks passed
@znarfm znarfm deleted the espeak branch November 28, 2025 23:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

new command Issues requesting creation of a new page or PRs adding a new page for a command. page edit Changes to an existing page(s). review needed Prioritized PRs marked for reviews from maintainers.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants