Skip to content

Conversation

@nightscape
Copy link
Contributor

@nightscape nightscape commented Aug 4, 2025

  • Use conventional PR title: <manifest-name[@version]|chore>: <general summary of the pull request>
  • I have read the Contributing Guide

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 4, 2025

All changes look good.

Wait for review from human collaborators.

mill

  • Description
  • License
  • Hashes
  • Checkver
  • Autoupdate

"homepage": "https://mill-build.com/",
"license": "MIT",
"suggest": {
"JDK": "java/openjdk"
Copy link
Member

@Lutra-Fs Lutra-Fs Aug 12, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would suggest removing OpenJDK deps as we have migrated to the native runner

"url": "https://github.com/com-lihaoyi/mill/releases/download/0.12.5/0.12.5-assembly#/mill.bat",
"hash": "0c7b25412feecf06d955d013418de9a9080ce755bedbac7601c9109c33d5a057",
"bin": "mill.bat",
"url": "https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/lihaoyi/mill-dist-native-windows-amd64/1.0.2/mill-dist-native-windows-amd64-1.0.2.exe#/mill.exe",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should use
"architecture" field to limit the native runner only run with AMD64(64 bit) machine. Because https://mill-build.org/mill/cli/installation-ide.html#_mill_native_and_jvm_executables clearly states that the native one does not support ARM64 architecture

@Lutra-Fs Lutra-Fs changed the title Mill: Update to 1.0.2 Mill: Update to 1.0.2, Migrate to Native runner Aug 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants