Comment changes to uploader.py and textsearch.py #36
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ordcount' loop.Changed and removed some comments if unclear or not needed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The comments should now follow the Python protocol. @lindsaypoirier I changed some comments to be a bit more clear about what things, and I removed comments that I felt weren't needed if the line it followed was straightforward. @DexterAntonio I noticed there was an extra for loop in the 'highlight_pdf' function that would make the program go though all iterations of wordcount twice. I tested it, and removing it gave the same results. Was this okay?